WWW.DIS.XLIBX.INFO
FREE ELECTRONIC LIBRARY - Thesis, dissertations, books
 
<< HOME
CONTACTS



Pages:   || 2 |

«LANGUAGE AND COGNITIVE PROCESSES, 2004, 19 (6), 665–675 Discourse coherence and pronoun resolution Florian Wolf and Edward Gibson Massachusetts ...»

-- [ Page 1 ] --

76 MFK-Mendip Page: 665 of 675 Date: 17/11/04 Time: 11:05am Job ID: LANGUAGE 007037

LANGUAGE AND COGNITIVE PROCESSES, 2004, 19 (6), 665–675

Discourse coherence and pronoun resolution

Florian Wolf and Edward Gibson

Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA, USA

Timothy Desmet

Ghent University, Belgium

This paper used self-paced reading to test processing preferences in

pronoun interpretation in English two clause sentences. The results

demonstrate that people’s preferences can be reversed by changing the coherence relation between the clauses. The results are not compatible with the existence of a single all-purpose strategy in pronoun resolution. Rather, the results support Kehler’s (2002) hypothesis that the processing patterns observed in pronoun processing are a byproduct of more general cognitive inference processes underlying the establishment of coherence, such that discourse coherence guides pronoun reference, and pronoun reference guides discourse coherence.

INTRODUCTION

An important component of language comprehension in most natural language contexts involves connecting clauses and phrases together in order to establish a coherent discourse. One critical way in which coherence can be established between clauses is by the use of referring expressions, such as pronouns (Garnham, 2001; Halliday & Hassan, 1976;

Johnson-Laird, 1983; Kintsch & Van Dyke, 1978; Sanford & Garrod, 1989). Thus an important part of discourse comprehension involves discovering how antecedents for pronouns are resolved. One well-known account of discourse processing with implications on pronominal resolution is Centering Theory, which predicts that pronouns prefer to have Correspondence should be addressed to Florian Wolf, MIT NE20-448, 3 Cambridge Center, Cambridge, MA 02139, USA. Email: fwolf@mit.edu Timothy Desmet is a Research Assistant of the Fund for Scientific Research – Flanders (Belgium) (F.W.O. Vlaanderen).

c  2004 Psychology Press Ltd http://www.tandf.co.uk/journals/pp/01690965.html DOI: 10.1080/01690960444000034 76 MFK-Mendip Page: 666 of 675 Date: 17/11/04 Time: 11:06am Job ID: LANGUAGE 007037 666 WOLF, GIBSON, DESMET antecedents in subject position (Brennan, Friedman, & Pollard, 1987;

Grosz, Joshi, & Weinstein, 1995; cf. also Wundt, 1911). In support of Centering Theory, Gordon, Grosz and Gilliom (1993) found that there is a preference to use pronouns to refer to entities in subject position, but not

for entities in object position. Consider the sentences in (1):1

(1) a. Fiona complimented Craig, and she congratulated James.

b. Fiona complimented Craig, and he congratulated James.

Intuitively, (1a) is easier to process than (1b). Centering explains this preference because the pronoun ‘she’ in (1a) refers back to the subject of the preceding clause, whereas the pronoun ‘he’ in (1b) refers back to the object of the preceding clause. A problem for Centering Theory is

provided by the contrast in (2):

(2) a. Fiona complimented Craig, and James congratulated her.

b. Fiona complimented Craig, and James congratulated him.

Contrary to Centering Theory’s subject preference prediction, Chambers and Smyth (1998) found in a self-paced reading experiment that sentences like (2b) were read faster than sentences like (2a). This pattern of results motivates the Parallel Preference account (Chambers & Smyth, 1998; see Lappin & Leass, 1994, for a combination of Centering Theory and Parallel Preference). Under the parallel preference account (Smyth, 1994), pronouns are argued to prefer antecedents in a parallel position when the pronoun- and the antecedent-containing sentence have the following properties: (a) both sentences have the same global constituent structure, (b) the thematic roles of the verbs in both sentences concur.

When these conditions are met, subject pronouns should prefer subject antecedents, and object pronouns should prefer object antecedents. This is the case in (1) and (2) above. In (1), people prefer the preceding clause’s subject as the referent for the subject pronoun, whereas in (2) people prefer the preceding clause’s object as the referent for the object pronoun.

Although a parallel preference account can explain the preferences in (1) and (2), it does not explain the preferences in (3), from Winograd (1972):

(3) a. The city council denied the demonstrators the permit because they advocated violence.

b. The city council denied the demonstrators the permit because they feared violence.

This paper follows the processing literature in focusing on the interpretation of unstressed pronouns. See Akmajian and Jackendoff (1970) among others for a discussion of the interpretation of stressed pronouns.

76 MFK-Mendip Page: 667 of 675 Date: 17/11/04 Time: 11:06am Job ID: LANGUAGE 007037

DISCOURSE COHERENCE AND PRONOUN RESOLUTION

In sentence (3a) the pronoun ‘they’ refers to ‘the demonstrators’, whereas in sentence (3b) it refers to ‘the city council’. Neither sentence seems particularly difficult to process. Notice, however, that both Centering Theory and Parallel Preference predict a preference for ‘they’ to refer to the subject, ‘the city council’ – Centering Theory because it predicts a preference for subject antecedents, and Parallel Preference because it predicts a preference for an antecedent in a parallel position. Examples like (3) motivate causal-inference-based accounts of pronoun processing (Hobbs, 1979; Hobbs, Stickel, Appelt & Martin, 1993; Kehler, 2002).





According to such accounts, ‘they’ refers to ‘the demonstrators’ in sentence (3a) because advocating violence is assumed to be a good reason for being denied a permit. In sentence (3b) ‘they’ refers to ‘the city council’ because fearing violence by demonstrators is a good reason for denying a permit to these demonstrators.

Experimental evidence relevant to causal-inference-based accounts of pronominal resolution is provided by Ehrlich (1980), who used an off-line questionnaire to investigate people’s preferred pronoun resolution.

Ehrlich found that pronoun resolution is only driven by causal inferences (cf. Caramazza, Grober, Garvey, & Yates, 1977; Stewart, Pickering & Sanford, 2000) when the clauses containing pronoun and antecedent respectively are in a causal relation. When there is no such causal relation, Ehrlich found that people prefer antecedents in topic or subject position (cf. Centering Theory, Grosz et al., 1995).

Although causal-based strategies can explain the effects in (3), they do not explain the patterns in (1) and (2), because there is no causal connection between the two clauses in each of these sentences.

Furthermore, resorting to a topic-based strategy like Centering Theory as suggested by Ehrlich makes the right prediction for (1), but not for (2), where the pronoun with an object antecedent is easier to process.

Based on Hobbs (1979), Kehler (2002) provides a hypothesis that aims to explain all of these patterns of pronoun resolution. Instead of arguing for pronoun-specific processing mechanisms, Kehler (2002), like Hobbs (1979), argues that pronoun resolution is a byproduct of establishing coherence. Kehler (2002) extends Hobbs’ (1979) key insight that the establishment of coherence guides pronoun resolution and vice versa, noting that discourse coherence and pronoun resolution mutually constrain each other: Pronoun resolution guides coherence, but coherence also guides pronoun resolution. Thus he hypothesises that how a pronoun is resolved may depend on the coherence relation between the clauses.

Two classes of coherence relations that are particularly relevant to the examples that have been discussed in the pronoun resolution literature are cause-effect and resemblance. A cause-effect relation holds between two clauses if a plausible causal relation can be inferred to hold between the 76 MFK-Mendip Page: 668 of 675 Date: 17/11/04 Time: 11:06am Job ID: LANGUAGE 007037

668 WOLF, GIBSON, DESMET

events described by the two clauses. The event described by one clause is the cause for the event described by the other clause, as in (3a). Because the demonstrators advocated violence, the city council denied them a permit to demonstrate. Kehler (2002) argues that the pronoun is interpreted such that a plausible cause-effect relation between the two clauses can be established. Pairing ‘they’ with ‘the demonstrators’ provides a more plausible interpretation for (3a) than pairing ‘they’ with ‘the city council’. A similar analysis applies to the pronoun resolution of ‘they’ in (3b).

The resemblance discourse relation is relevant to explaining the pattern of preferences in (1) and (2). A resemblance relation holds between two clauses if the events described by the two clauses are in a similarity or in a

contrast relation, as in the following examples from Kehler (2002):

(4) a. Resemblance, Similarity Gephardt organized rallies for Gore, and Daschle distributed pamphlets for him.

b. Resemblance, Contrast Gephardt supported Gore, but Armey opposed him.

Kehler (2002) hypothesizes that the first step in establishing a resemblance relation between clauses is to find parallel corresponding entities and events. Then these entities and events are put into similarity or contrast relations. For example, in sentence (4a), ‘organised rallies’ is parallel and similar to ‘distributed pamphlets’ (both predicates describe actions of supporting a political candidate), and ‘Dick Gephardt’ is parallel and similar to ‘Tom Daschle’ (both are American politicians that are similar in that they support Al Gore). Then, Kehler (2002) argues, the pronoun ‘him’ is paired with its parallel preceding element, ‘Gore’. In sentence (4b), ‘supported’ is parallel and in contrast to ‘opposed’. ‘Gephardt’ is parallel and in contrast to ‘Armey’ (both are politicians that are in contrast in that one of them supports Gore and the other one opposes him). Then, as in sentence (4a), the pronoun ‘him’ is paired with its parallel preceding element, ‘Gore’. Thus, in both sentences (4a) and (4b), the pronoun is bound to its antecedent during the establishment of a resemblance coherence relation, when parallel entities are matched.

The resemblance relation is the most plausible coherence relation between each of the clauses in the sentences in (1) and (2). In particular, the use of the similar verbs ‘complimented’ and ‘congratulated’ in the absence of any other cues induces a resemblance-similarity relation between each pair of clauses. Kehler’s theory then predicts that a parallel preference strategy would be in effect under the resemblance relation, which has been observed experimentally in such sentences (Chambers & Smyth, 1998).

76 MFK-Mendip Page: 669 of 675 Date: 17/11/04 Time: 11:06am Job ID: LANGUAGE 007037

–  –  –

A strong prediction of Kehler’s theory is that pronoun resolution preferences can be altered depending on the coherence relation between clauses. The experiment presented here tests this prediction directly.

–  –  –

Materials. Twenty sets of sentences were constructed, each with four conditions in a 2 Â 2 design: coherence relation (resemblance, causeeffect) Â parallel reference (parallel, nonparallel). An example item is

presented in (5):

(5) a. Resemblance, Parallel Reference Fiona complimented Craig and similarly James congratulated him after the match but nobody took any notice.

b. Resemblance, Nonparallel Reference Fiona complimented Craig and similarly James congratulated her after the match but nobody took any notice.

c. Cause-Effect, Parallel Reference Fiona defeated Craig and so James congratulated him after the match but nobody took any notice.

d. Cause-Effect, Nonparallel Reference Fiona defeated Craig and so James congratulated her after the match but nobody took any notice.

Each sentence consisted of three clauses. The second clause was the target clause which consisted of the same words across the coherence manipulation. We manipulated the coherence relation between resemblance and cause-effect by making two changes to the items: (1) by using different connectives between the clauses (‘and similarly’ vs. ‘and so’), (2) by using a different verb in the first clause. For resemblance, the verbs in the two clauses were semantically similar according to the WordNet lexical database (Fellbaum, 2001), e.g., ‘compliment’ and ‘congratulate’ in (5).

For the cause-effect conditions, the verb of the first clause in the causeeffect condition was chosen so that there was a plausible causal relation between the two clauses such that the object pronoun referred to the subject of the first clause, e.g., ‘defeat’ and ‘congratulate’ in (5). The first clause verb in the cause-effect conditions always differed from the first clause verb in the resemblance conditions. The remainder of the sentences consisted of a prepositional phrase and a third clause. This portion of the 76 MFK-Mendip Page: 670 of 675 Date: 17/11/04 Time: 11:06am Job ID: LANGUAGE 007037

670 WOLF, GIBSON, DESMET

items was the same across the four conditions. Overall, the only differences between the resemblance and cause-effect conditions were the verbs of the first clause and the connectives relating the two clauses.

Notice that this experiment did not explore the relative contribution of different coherence cues to changing pronoun interpretation preferences.

This does not diminish the point of the current design, which is simply to show that changing the coherence relation by using one or more cues may alter pronoun interpretation preferences.

The target sentences were combined with 76 fillers of various types in four lists balancing all factors in a Latin Squares design. Appendix A provides a complete list of the stimuli. The stimuli were pseudorandomised separately for each participant, so that at least one filler item intervened between two targets.



Pages:   || 2 |


Similar works:

«CHAPTER 8 COIN OF THE REALM: PRACTICAL PROCEDURES FOR DETERMINING AUTHORSHIP THOMAS F. BABOR AND DOMINIQUE MORISANO Like a coin, authorship has two sides: credit and responsibility. One receives professional credit from his/her publications and takes responsibility for their contents. Biagioli et al. (1999, p. 2) INTRODUCTION Authorship credit is conceivably the most important and least understood area of professional life for members of the scientific community. Because promotion, prestige,...»

«CURRICULUM VITAE MASSIMO FORNASIER 1. PERSONAL DATA, EDUCATION, CAREER, AND AVAILABILITY 2. SCIENTIFIC RESEARCH ACTIVITY 2.1 Research directions 2.2 Synthesis of the scientific activity in approximation theory and numerical harmonic analysis 2.3 Synthesis of the scientific activity in digital signal and image processing 2.4 Synthesis of the scientific activity in numerical solution of (pseudo)differential equations 3. COMPLETE LIST OF PUBLICATION 4. CONFERENCE, SEMINAR, AND COURSE PARTICIPATION...»

«1 James L. Green, Ext. Hort. Specialist & Joe Capizzi, Extension Entomologist ORNAMENTALS Nov.-Dec. 1990 OSU, Corvallis, OR 97331 NORTHWEST Vol.13, Issue 6 Otis Maloy, Extension Plant Pathologist Pages ii-24 ARCHIVES Washington State University Pullman, WA 99164 A SYSTEMATIC APPROACH TO DIAGNOSING PLANT DAMAGE CONTENTS Page Number LIST OF FIGURES AND TABLES 2 INTRODUCTION 2 FLOW MODEL FOR DIAGNOSING PLANT DAMAGE 3 I. DEFINE THE PROBLEM A. Plant Identification & Characteristics 5 B. Examine the...»

«COMPONENTS OF A RESEARCH ARTICLE Beth A. Fischer and Michael J. Zigmond Title Purpose: To attract readers interested in this field of study. The importance of the title cannot be overstated as it is a major determinant of whether the paper will be read. It is the only aspect of the article that appears in tables of contents and in many of the databases used for literature searches. Content: The title should indicate the focus of the paper, and should contain enough relevant “keywords”...»

«Title: Impact Assessment (IA) Impact Assessment of the Wales Bill IA No:       Date: 07/06/2016 Lead department or agency: Stage: Final Wales Office Source of intervention: Domestic Other departments or agencies: Type of measure: Primary legislation DECC, DfT, DCLG, DEFRA, HMT, HMRC, CO Contact for enquiries: Peter Newbitt 020 Summary: Intervention and Options RPC Opinion: Not Applicable Cost of Preferred (or more likely) Option Total Net Present Business Net Net cost to business per...»

«COUNTING FINITE INDEX SUBGROUPS ALEXANDER LUBOTZKY Institute of Mathematics, Hebrew University, Jerusalem 91904, Israel For Karl Gruenberg on his 65th birthday. Introduction Let F be a finitely generated group. Denote by an(T) (resp.rn(r)) the number of subgroups of F of index n (resp. of index at most n). This paper deals with the connection between the algebraic structure of the group F and the arithmetic properties of the sequence a n (F), n — 1,2,3,., e.g., the growth of the sequence...»

«Shakespeare and love Lesson plan Topic: The balcony scene in Romeo and Juliet Level: B2+ Time: 90 minutes Aims  To contextualise the balcony scene in Shakespeare’s play Romeo and Juliet in order to increase students’ interest in and awareness of drama in general and Shakespeare in particular  To practise both reading for gist and close reading Introduction This lesson is based around the balcony scene in Romeo and Juliet. It looks at the themes and language that Shakespeare uses to...»

«Micron MOTIONEERING® User’s Guide Table of Contents 1.0 Introduction 2.0 Sizing and Selection Mode 2.1 Primary Configuration 2.2 Application Types 2.3 Torque and Speed Requirements 2.4 The Motion Profile 3.0 Selecting a RediMount Kit 3.1 Select by Motor Model Number 3.2 Entering Your Motor Dimensions Manually 3.3 Problems Generating RediMount Part Numbers 4.0 Choosing a Solution 5.0 Select Gearhead by Model Number Mode 6.0 Gearhead Express 7.0 Appendices 7.1 Appendix A: RediMount Guidelines...»

«NASDAQ OMX Copenhagen A/S NASDAQ OMX Helsinki Ltd NASDAQ OMX Iceland hf NASDAQ OMX Stockholm AB Rules for the Construction and Maintenance of the NASDAQ OMX All-Share, Benchmark and Sector Indexes Version 2.2 / December 8, 2014 TABLE OF CONTENTS DEFINITIONS 1 INTRODUCTION 1.1 THE INDEX FAMILY 1.2 NASDAQ OMX INDEX COMMITTEE 1.3 INDEX CURRENCY 2 SECTOR CLASSIFICATION 2.1 NASDAQ OMX AND FTSE GROUP (FTSE) 2.1.1 THE CLASSIFICATION 2.1.2 COMPANY CLASSIFICATION GUIDELINES 3 INDEX CONSTRUCTION AND...»

«SSE Riga Student Research Papers 2014 : 9 (165) AN EXPLORATION OF BUNDLING IN THE TELECOMMUNICATIONS INDUSTRY IN LATVIA Authors: Gints Bukovskis Kristaps Tomsons ISSN 1691-4643 ISBN 978-9984-842-85-1 November 2014 Riga Gints Bukovskis, Kristaps Tomsons | ii AN EXPLORATION OF BUNDLING IN THE TELECOMMUNICATIONS INDUSTRY IN LATVIA Authors: Gints Bukovskis, Kristaps Tomsons Supervisor: John David Branch November 2014 Riga Gints Bukovskis, Kristaps Tomsons | iii Executive Summary The...»

«March-April, 2015 Monthly Newsletter of VIDYA Delhi NCR • Mumbai • Bangalore One VIDYA, One Mission, One Vision One Culture. May the Force Continue to be with VIDYA Power of ONE Leaders' Conclave To commemorate VIDYA's reaching milestone 30, a Leaders Conclave was flagged off on March 30-31 at the IIT Roorkee guest house in Greater Noida near Delhi. The conclave was attended by almost 50 leaders of VIDYA from Delhi, Mumbai, Bangalore and Pune. It was an enthusiastic and excited group of...»

«ObjectGlobe: Open Distributed Query Processing Services on the Internet ∗ D. Kossmann† R. Braumandl M. Keidl A. Kemper S. Seltzsam K. Stocker † TU University of Passau Munich last name @db.fmi.uni-passau.de kossmann@in.tum.de 1 Vision Today, there is a vast discrepancy between data publication and data processing capabilities on the Internet. Virtually anybody can publish data, e.g., in HTMLor XML-format. Consequently, a wide range of (different quality) data sources exist on the...»





 
<<  HOME   |    CONTACTS
2016 www.dis.xlibx.info - Thesis, dissertations, books

Materials of this site are available for review, all rights belong to their respective owners.
If you do not agree with the fact that your material is placed on this site, please, email us, we will within 1-2 business days delete him.