WWW.DIS.XLIBX.INFO
FREE ELECTRONIC LIBRARY - Thesis, dissertations, books
 
<< HOME
CONTACTS



Pages:   || 2 |

«On December 1, 2008, the Department of Health and Human Services (“HHS”) Office of Human Research Protections (“OHRP”) announced the ...»

-- [ Page 1 ] --

FDA & OHRP Guidance on Data Retention and Other Considerations

Applicable to Subjects Who Withdraw From Clinical Research

by Amy Dow and Wendy C. Goldstein

December 2008

On December 1, 2008, the Department of Health and Human Services (“HHS”) Office

of Human Research Protections (“OHRP”) announced the availability of a Draft

“Guidance on Important Considerations for When Participation of Human Subjects in

Research is Discontinued” (“OHRP Guidance”).1 The OHRP Guidance applies to any research involving human subjects that is supported by federal funding or regulated by federal agencies that have adopted the HHS human subject protection regulations at 46 C.F.R. §101, et seq. (“Common Rule”), and may include clinical research that also is subject to the FDA Guidance.2 Simultaneously, the United States Food and Drug Administration (“FDA”) announced the availability of a related final guidance document for immediate implementation titled “Guidance for Sponsors, Clinical Investigators, and IRBs: Data Retention When Subjects Withdraw from FDARegulated Clinical Trials” (“FDA Guidance”).3 The FDA Guidance applies to all clinical research regulated by the FDA including research conducted under an IND or IDE, studies of non-significant risk devices and other research submitted in support of a marketing application or used to support marketing claims for a drug, biologic or medical device.

These guidance documents are significant as they represent the first formal public guidance from the agencies and affirm previous informal statements and positions of FDA and OHRP regarding a subject who withdraws from clinical research by choice or who is withdrawn by the investigator.4 This Alert provides an overview of the guidance documents and discusses some of the key compliance considerations for sponsors, investigators, institutions, IRBs and other entities involved in clinical research.

The OHRP Guidance is a draft guidance document, subject to a 60-day comment period and issuance of a final guidance document for implementation.

Those entities subject to the Common Rule should review the OHRP Guidance to determine whether they wish to provide comments to the OHRP. Information www.ebglaw.com regarding submission of comments on the OHRP Guidance can be found at: http://www.hhs.gov/ohrp/requests/. Comments must be submitted by January 30, 2009.

OVERVIEW

Inclusion in Study Database: Previously Collected Data from Withdrawn Subjects FDA Guidance The FDA’s Guidance is consistent with FDA’s longstanding policy for FDA-regulated trials5 that information collected prior to a subject’s withdrawal should remain part of the study database to ensure the scientific validity of the research. The FDA Guidance describes current FDA requirements for collection, maintenance and submission to FDA of complete and accurate data regarding clinical investigations6 and articulates the FDA’s concerns relating to the reliability of study analyses that exclude data for withdrawn subjects. Specifically, the FDA describes its concern that withdrawn subjects are more likely to have experienced adverse events or a failure of efficacy, and the exclusion of their data has an increased probability of introducing bias and negatively impacting the scientific validity of the research.7 Citing to international ethical guidance, the FDA Guidance asserts that the scientific validity of study data is also an ethical imperative.8 This ethical guidance provides that research that is not scientifically valid fails to offer a potential benefit to justify the risks to human subjects.

OHRP Guidance

The OHRP Guidance describes the manner in which the Common Rule permits an investigator to continue to analyze previously collected data and, under certain circumstances, to collect additional data regarding a subject who withdraws (or is withdrawn by the investigator) from a clinical trial. Regardless of whether a subject’s withdrawal constitutes complete or partial discontinuation of participation in the research,9 an investigator may continue to analyze data collected from the subject or derived from the subject’s biological specimens up to the time of withdrawal without regard to the subject’s consent, since OHRP has determined that these activities are not included in the definition of ‘participation’ in research requiring a subject’s consent.10 While OHRP excludes analysis of previously collected data from the definition of ‘participation’ in research requiring informed consent, the OHRP Guidance distinguishes the applicability of such activities to the definition of ‘human subjects research’ requiring IRB approval and continuing review pursuant to HHS regulations.11 OHRP Guidance states that research continues to involve human subjects during any period in which the investigator continues to analyze previously collected data, even if direct interventions with research subjects have ceased. Therefore, such activities

require continuing IRB review at least annually.12

The OHRP Guidance specifically addresses the applicability of the HIPAA Privacy Rule13 to the continued use of individually identifiable private information regarding a research subject collected prior to a subject’s withdrawal from a clinical trial. The HIPAA Privacy Rule permits an individual to revoke authorization for the use of individually identifiable private information in writing.14 However, there is an exception when a covered entity has taken action in reliance on the authorization.15 The OHRP Guidance provides that, “[i]n the context of research, this reliance exception permits the continued use and disclosure of protected health information already obtained pursuant to the Authorization prior to its revocation, to the extent necessary to protect the integrity of the research study.” Therefore, OHRP believes that the continued analysis of previously collected data regarding a withdrawn subject is not inconsistent with a covered entity’s obligations pursuant the HIPAA Privacy Rule.





Retention and Analysis of Previously Collected Biological Specimens

–  –  –

The OHRP Guidance provides detailed examples to illustrate the circumstances under which data derived from biological specimens may be used when a subject withdraws from clinical research. According to the OHRP Guidance, a biological specimen that was collected, but was not analyzed prior to a subject’s withdrawal may not be analyzed following a subject’s complete withdrawal from a study. OHRP considers such analysis to constitute data collection within the scope of a subject’s participation, thereby requiring consent.

FDA Guidance

The FDA Guidance is silent regarding the analysis of previously collected biological specimens. While the FDA Guidance requires the use of data collected up to the time of the subject’s withdrawal, the FDA Guidance fails to distinguish those instances in which the data sought has not yet been extracted from a biological specimen.

Responding to a Subject’s Withdrawal

–  –  –

In the FDA Guidance, the FDA recommends that “when a subject withdraws from a study, the data collected on the subject to the point of withdrawal remains part of the study database and may not be removed.”16 An investigator may request that a subject permit continued data collection following withdrawal from interventional portions of the study. This should include a discussion of any follow-up activities including interviews or collection of data from chart reviews, as well as the maintenance of privacy and confidentiality of the subject’s individually identifiable information. If a subject agrees to continued follow-up, informed consent must be obtained using an IRB approved informed consent document unless follow-up activities

after withdrawal were addressed in the original informed consent document.

If a subject withdraws and does not consent to the collection of follow-up data, the investigator is not permitted to access the subject’s medical record or other confidential records requiring the subject’s consent for study purposes. Nevertheless, study data related to the subject that were collected prior to the subject’s withdrawal may be reviewed by the investigator.

OHRP Guidance

When a subject notifies study personnel of his/her intention to discontinue participation in a clinical trial, the OHRP Guidance recommends that the investigator or his/her designee attempt to clarify whether the subject is requesting complete or partial discontinuation of participation. If the subject’s intention is to discontinue the intervention(s) under study, an investigator may continue any other research activities involving the subject’s participation that are described in the IRB-approved protocol.

Similarly, an investigator who discontinues a subject’s use of a research intervention(s) should request permission to continue those research activities described in the IRBapproved protocol that do not involve the intervention(s) under study.

A subject’s decision to withdraw from a clinical trial should be documented in the study

records. The OHRP Guidance recommends that such documentation at least include:

• “Whether the discontinuation of the subject’s participation resulted from a decision by the subject or by the investigator;

• Whether the discontinuation involves some or all types of participation; and The reason for the discontinuation.”17 • A subject’s withdrawal from a clinical trial also should be reported to the IRB. An individual report should be submitted promptly “if the discontinuation was related to an unanticipated problem involving risks to the subject.” In other circumstances, the subject’s withdrawal may be reported in the next continuing review report.18

COMPLIANCE CONSIDERATIONS

Each entity engaged in clinical research is responsible for ensuring the scientific validity, ethical soundness, and regulatory compliance of its operations. Entities subject to the FDA Guidance and OHRP Guidance should review and evaluate current operations, processes, policies and compliance infrastructure to determine whether the recommendations set forth in these guidance documents are addressed adequately. Specifically, sponsors, investigators, institutions, IRBs and other entities involved in clinical research should review policies and procedures, training materials and template documents related to protocol development, statistical analysis and informed consent of clinical research subjects to determine whether they comply with these new guidance documents’ recommendations. These entities

should consider:

• Updating applicable policies and procedures to ensure consistency with the recommendations of FDA and OHRP, as applicable. These may include: policies related to statistical analysis of data from subjects who discontinue participation in a clinical trial; retention and analysis of biological specimens collected from withdrawn subjects; informed consent document development, review or completion; the informed consent process; development of protocol sections regarding informed consent and discontinuation of study subjects; IRB review of initial protocols and informed consent documents; IRB continuing review reports and IRB continuing review of research activities following discontinuation of study subjects.

• Reviewing informed consent document templates to ensure that the documents accurately disclose the extent to which subject data will be used in the event a subject withdraws from the research. Entities should consider whether consent to continuing follow-up data collection activities in the event of subject withdrawal should be sought in informed consent documents used to consent subjects for trial participation or whether separate informed consent documents should be developed for use at the time of withdrawal.

• Providing training to individuals involved in planning, review, implementation and analysis of clinical trials regarding the recommendations of the FDA Guidance and OHRP Guidance, as applicable, and any updates to template documents, policies, processes and procedures.

• Submitting comments to address uncertainties in the OHRP Guidance or in the FDA Guidance. One area for potential comment may include the lack of clarity regarding the treatment biological specimens under the FDA Guidance. While the FDA Guidance is a final guidance document, issued for immediate implementation, the FDA will accept comments on such guidance documents.

Additionally, sponsors of clinical research should consider:

• Reviewing protocol templates and case report forms to ensure these documents incorporate additional documentation recommendations for withdrawn subjects, such as reason for withdrawal and whether withdrawal was the decision of the subject or the investigator.

• Confirming that statistical analysis plans include analysis of data for withdrawn subjects. While many sponsors may perform intent-to-treat analyses and have procedures in place to interpret or impute missing data from withdrawn subjects, confirmation that statistical analysis plans comply with the recommendations of the FDA guidance may be considered.

* * *

For questions regarding this alert and topic, please contact:

–  –  –

The EpsteinBeckerGreen Client Alert is published by EBG's Health Care and Life Sciences practice to inform health care organizations of all types about significant new legal developments.

–  –  –

If you would like to be added to our mailing list or need to update your contact information, please contact, Jennifer Sunshine, jsunshine@ebglaw.com or 202/861-1872.

This document has been provided for informational purposes only and is not intended and should not be construed to constitute legal advice. Please consult your attorneys in connection with any fact-specific situation under federal law and the applicable state or local laws that may impose additional obligations on you and your company.

© 2008 Epstein Becker & Green, P.C.

Attorney Advertising Endnotes 73 Fed. Reg. 72804 (December 1, 2008).



Pages:   || 2 |


Similar works:

«Journal of Urban Health: Bulletin of the New York Academy of Medicine, Vol. 84, No. 1 doi:10.1007/s11524-007-9182-6 * 2007 The New York Academy of Medicine Cities and Calamities: Learning from Post-Disaster Response in Indonesia Josef Leitmann Abstract The article examines the post-disaster response to recent urban-centered calamities in Indonesia, extracting lessons learned and identifying specific implications for public health. Brief background information is provided on the December 2004...»

«EDMONTON’S GUIDE TO PREVENTING & GETTING RID OF BED BUGS SAFELY A Guide for Property Owners, Operators, Managers & Tenants Contents Using this Guide 2 Recognizing a Bed Bug 3 How Bed Bugs Grow and Reproduce 4 The Health Effects of Bed Bugs 5 Preventing Bed Bugs from Infesting Your Home 5 Inspecting for Bed Bugs 6 Tools You Can Use 8 Trap and Kill Bed Bugs 8 Seal Cracks and Crevices 9 Getting Rid of Bed Bugs 9 Physical Control Measures 10 Chemical Control Measures 12 Weekly Cleaning Measures...»

«Volume 25 http://acousticalsociety.org/ 170th Meeting of the Acoustical Society of America Jacksonville, Florida 2-6 November 2015 Animal Bioacoustics: Paper 2pABa6 Vibrational duetting mimics to trap and disrupt mating of the devastating Asian citrus psyllid insect pest. Richard W. Mankin US Department of Agriculture-ARS, Center for Medical, Agricultural and Veterinary Entomology, Gainesville, FL 32607; Richard.Mankin@ars.usda.gov Barukh Rohde Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering,...»

«May 1994 CHLORDANE ii DISCLAIMER The use of company or product name(s) is for identification only and does not imply endorsement by the Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry. CHLORDANE iii A Toxicological Profile for Chlordane was released on December 1989. This edition supersedes any previously released draft or final profile. Toxicological profiles are revised and republished as necessary, but no less than once every three years. For information regarding the update status of...»

«How to Develop a Research Protocol Goals & Objectives: To explain the theory of science To explain the theory of research To list the steps involved in developing and conducting a research protocol Outline: Introduction What is reasoning? Scientific approach What is science? Three domains of science Function of science What is research? Steps in research (Scientific Approach) Identify the question or problem Sources used Criteria for evaluation Conduct a literature review of question Primary...»

«UNIVERSITÀ DEGLI STUDI DI TORINO DIPARTIMENTO DI PSICOLOGIA DOTTORATO DI RICERCA IN SCIENZE UMANE PSICOLOGIA DELLA SALUTE E DELLA QUALITÀ DELLA VITA CICLO: XXV TITOLO DELLA TESI Workaholism: Definitions, measures, and dynamics DOTTORANDA: Monica Molino TUTOR: Prof.ssa Chiara Ghislieri COORDINATORE DEL DOTTORATO: Prof.ssa Cristina Onesta Mosso ANNI ACCADEMICI: 2010/2012 SETTORE SCIENTIFICO-DISCIPLINARE DI AFFERENZA: M-PSI/06 CONTENTS INTRODUCTION Defining workaholism CHAPTER 1 Workaholism...»

«SAFETY DATA SHEET Buffing Solution Section 1: Chemical Product and Company Information 1.1 Product Identifier Buffing Solution Common Name: VMI PN7076 Trade Name: 1.2 Relevant Identified Uses of the Substance or Mixture and Uses Advised Against Product Use: Buffing Solution Uses Advised Against: None identified 1.3 Details of the Supplier of the Substance or Mixture Manufacturer/Supplier: VenMill Industries 36 Town Forest Road Oxford, MA 01540 Tel: 508-363-0410 Fax: 508-363-0414 1.4 Emergency...»

«Guidance for Comprehensive Cancer Control Planning Volume 1: Guidelines Division of Cancer Prevention and Control Centers for Disease Control and Prevention 4770 Buford Highway, NE Atlanta, GA 30341 03/25/02 Acknowledgements The document entitled Guidance for Comprehensive Cancer Control Planning was jointly prepared by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), Division of Cancer Prevention and Control (DCPC), and the Battelle Centers for Public Health Research and Evaluation...»

«Verification of Liveness Properties Using Compositional Reachability Analysis Shing Chi Cheung† Dimitra Giannakopoulou‡ Jeff Kramer‡ †Department of Computer Science, Hong Kong University of Science and Technology, Clear Water Bay, Hong Kong. ‡Department of Computing, Imperial College of Science, Technology and Medicine, London SW7 2BZ, UK. Email: scc@cs.ust.hk, {dg1, jk}@doc.ic.ac.uk Abstract The software architecture of a distributed program can be represented by a hierarchical...»

«EUROPEAN COMMISSION HEALTH AND CONSUMERS DIRECTORATE-GENERAL Report on the public consultation on the possible revision of the Tobacco Products Directive (2001/37/EC) Health and Consumers Directorate-General – Directorate D – Health systems and products D4 – Substances of human origin and Tobacco control July 2011 Executive Summary The public consultation generated over 85 000 contributions, which illustrates a great • interest in EU tobacco control policy. Citizen contributions...»

«Whole Detox A 21Day Personalized Program to Break Through Barriers in Every Area of Your Life Deanna Minich Learn More or Pre-order at Whole-Detox.com Copyright This book contains advice and information relating to health and is not meant to diagnose, treat, or prescribe. It should be used to supplement rather than replace the advice of your physician or other trained health-care practitioner. If you know or suspect you have a medical condition, have physical symptoms, or feel unwell, it is...»

«J. Clin. Med. 2015, 4, 1269-1280; doi:10.3390/jcm4061269 OPEN ACCESS Journal of Clinical Medicine ISSN 2077-0383 www.mdpi.com/journal/jcm Review Kidney Transplantation in the Diabetic Patient María José Pérez-Sáez and Julio Pascual * Department of Nephrology, Hospital del Mar, Barcelona 08003, Spain; E-Mail: mjoseperezsaez@gmail.com * Author to whom correspondence should be addressed; E-Mail: julpascual@gmail.com; Tel.: +34-932483162; Fax: +34-932483373. Academic Editors: Juan F....»





 
<<  HOME   |    CONTACTS
2016 www.dis.xlibx.info - Thesis, dissertations, books

Materials of this site are available for review, all rights belong to their respective owners.
If you do not agree with the fact that your material is placed on this site, please, email us, we will within 1-2 business days delete him.