FREE ELECTRONIC LIBRARY - Thesis, dissertations, books

Pages:   || 2 |

«Redefining capitalism Eric Beinhocker and Nick Hanauer Despite its ability to generate prosperity, capitalism is under attack. By shaking up our ...»

-- [ Page 1 ] --

S E P T E M B E R 2 014

Redefining capitalism

Eric Beinhocker and Nick Hanauer

Despite its ability to generate prosperity,

capitalism is under attack. By shaking

up our long-held assumptions about how and

why the system works, we can improve it.

Capitalism is under attack. The financial crisis of 2008, the

stagnation of the middle class in many developed countries, and

rising income inequality are challenging some of our most deeply

held beliefs about how a fair and well-functioning society should be organized.

Many business leaders are of two minds about the situation. They note that market capitalism has yielded massive increases in human prosperity, particularly in the West in the 19th and 20th centuries.

More recently, it has lifted hundreds of millions from poverty in emerging economies. Yet despite these historic accomplishments, it’s also easy to worry that something is wrong with how the system is performing today.

This article will argue that while we have been correct to believe that capitalism has been the major source of historical growth and prosperity, we have been mostly incorrect in identifying how and why it worked so well. By analogy, our ancestors did know that the stars and planets moved in the sky and had various theories to explain their observations. But it wasn’t until the Copernican model replaced the Earth with the sun at the center of the solar system and Newton articulated his laws of gravitation that people understood how and why they move.

Likewise, the conventional economic theories we have relied upon for the past century have misled us about the workings of capitalism.

Only by replacing our old theories with better and more modern ones will we build the deeper understanding necessary to improve our capitalist system.

Rocking-horse versus wild-horse economics For the past century, the dominant economic paradigm—neoclassical economics—has painted a narrow and mechanistic view of how capitalism works, focusing on the role of markets and prices in

the efficient allocation of society’s resources. The story is familiar:

rational, self-interested firms maximize profits; rational, selfinterested consumers maximize their “utility”; the decisions of these actors drive supply to equal demand; prices are set; the market clears; and resources are allocated in a socially optimal way.

Over the past several decades, though, some of the bedrock assumptions of neoclassical theory have begun to unravel. Behavioral economists have accumulated a mountain of evidence showing that real humans don’t behave as a rational homo economicus would.

Experimental economists have raised awkward questions about the very existence of utility; and that is problematic because it has long been the device economists use to show that markets maximize social welfare. Empirical economists have identified anomalies suggesting that financial markets aren’t always efficient. And the macroeconomic models built on neoclassical ideas performed very poorly during the financial crisis.

Andy Haldane, the chief economist of the Bank of England, notes that the conventional theory views the economy as a rocking horse that, when perturbed by an outside force, sways for a while before predictably settling back down to a static equilibrium. But, as Haldane has pointed out, what we saw during the crisis was more like a herd of wild horses—something spooks one of them, it kicks another horse, and pretty soon the whole herd is running wildly in a pattern of complex, dynamic behavior.1 1 Andy Haldane discussed these views in a speech on November 11, 2013, at an event held by the United Kingdom’s Treasury: “Teaching economics as if the last decade mattered.” In the years before the crisis, a new view of economics began to stir.

Since the crisis, it has begun to blossom.2 This view holds that the economy is a constantly evolving, interacting network of highly diverse households, firms, banks, regulators, and other agents, more like Haldane’s wild herd than a rocking horse. The economy— a complex, dynamic, open, and nonlinear system—has more in common with an ecosystem than with the mechanistic systems the neoclassicists modeled their theory on. The implications of this emerging view are only just beginning to be explored. But the two of us believe it has fundamental implications for how people think about the nature of capitalism and prosperity.

Significantly, this view shifts our perspective on how and why markets work from their allocative efficiency to their effectiveness in promoting creativity. It suggests that markets are evolutionary systems that each day carry out millions of simultaneous experiments on ways to make our lives better. In other words, the essential role of capitalism is not allocation—it is creation. Life isn’t drastically better for billions of people today than it was in 1800 because we are allocating the resources of the 19th-century economy more efficiently. Rather, it is better because we have life-saving antibiotics, indoor plumbing, motorized transport, access to vast amounts of information, and an enormous number of technical and social innovations that have become available to much (if not yet all) of the world’s population. The genius of capitalism is that it both creates incentives for solving human problems and makes those solutions widely available. And it is solutions to human problems that define prosperity, not money.

Prosperity redefined Most of us intuitively believe that the more money people have, the more prosperous a society must be. America’s average household disposable income in 2013 was $38,001, versus $28,194 for Canada;3 therefore, people believe, America is more prosperous than Canada.

2 See Eric D. Beinhocker, The Origin of Wealth: Evolution, Complexity, and the Radical Remaking of Economics, Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press, 2006; and Nick Hanauer and Eric Liu, The Gardens of Democracy: A New American Story of Citizenship, the Economy, and the Role of Government, Seattle, WA: Sasquatch Books, 2011.

3 OECD Better Life Initiative, OECD Better Life Index: Country Reports, 2013, oecd.org.

But the idea that prosperity is simply about having money can be disproved with a simple thought experiment. Imagine you had the $38,001 income of a typical American but lived among the Yanomami people, an isolated hunter-gatherer tribe deep in the Brazilian rainforest. You’d easily be the richest of the Yanomami (they don’t use money, but anthropologists estimate their standard of living at something around $90 a year). But you’d still feel a lot poorer than the average American. Even after you’d fixed up your hut, bought the best baskets in the village, and eaten the finest Yanomami cuisine, all of your riches still wouldn’t get you antibiotics, air conditioning, or a comfy bed. Yet even the poorest Americans typically have access to these important elements of well-being.

This is why prosperity in human societies can’t be properly understood by looking just at monetary measures, such as income or wealth. Prosperity in a society is the accumulation of solutions to human problems.

These solutions run from the prosaic (crunchier potato chips) to the profound (cures for deadly diseases). Ultimately, the measure of the wealth of a society is the range of human problems it has solved and how available it has made those solutions to its people. Every item in a modern retail store can be thought of as a solution to a different kind of problem—how to eat, dress, entertain, make homes more comfortable, and so on. The more and better the solutions available to us, the more prosperity we have.

Growth redefined

We typically talk about growth in terms of GDP, though it has been much criticized recently as a measure of progress. There have been a variety of attempts to make GDP account for things such as environmental damage, unpaid work, the progress of technology, or the development of human capital.

In our view, the biggest problem with GDP is that it doesn’t necessarily reflect how growth changes the real, lived experience of most people. In the United States, for example, GDP has more than tripled over the last three decades. Although those increases have been concentrated at the top of the income spectrum, people across the board have benefited from improvements in technology (say, safer cars, new medical treatments, and smartphones). Other changes, though, have been accompanied by unintended consequences (such as the stress many knowledge workers feel from 24/7 connectivity). Is life actually better or worse for most people? How are the gains of growth shared? GDP cannot answer these questions.

If the concept of growth is to have significance, it should represent improvements in lived experience. If the real measure of a society’s prosperity is the availability of solutions to human problems, growth cannot simply be measured by changes in GDP. Rather, it must be a measure of the rate at which new solutions to human problems become available.

Going from fearing death by sinus infection one day to having access to life-saving antibiotics the next, for example, is growth. Going from sweltering in the heat one day to living with air conditioning the next is growth. Going from walking long distances to driving is growth. Going from needing to look up basic information in a library to having all the world’s information instantly available on your phone is growth.

Growth is best thought of as an increase in the quality and availability of solutions to human problems. Problems differ in importance, and a new view of growth must take this into account: finding a cure for cancer would trump many other product innovations. But in general, economic growth is the actual experience of having our lives improved.

This is different from other alternative measures of growth. For example, research shows that happiness does not necessarily correlate with GDP growth—Bhutan has even famously developed a Gross National Happiness (GNH) Index. Likewise, the United Nations created a Human Development Index (HDI) based on Amartya Sen’s theory of human capabilities and freedom. What the two of us are proposing sits somewhere between GDP and these measures. Like GDP, it is intended to be a definition of material prosperity. But it is also a more meaningful way of thinking about material standards of living than GDP.

Can the rate at which solutions appear and their availability be measured? While such a measure has not been tried yet, we believe it is possible. Inflation is measured by looking at changes in the prices of goods and services in a “basket” typically consumed by households. Similarly, it’s possible to look at how the actual contents of such a basket are changing across time or how they differ across countries or levels of income. What kind of food, housing, clothing, transport, healthcare, education, leisure, and entertainment do people have access to?

Capitalism redefined If prosperity is created by solving human problems, a key question for society is what kind of economic system will solve the most problems for the most people most quickly. This is the genius of capitalism: it is an unmatched evolutionary system for finding solutions.

Finding new solutions to human problems is rarely easy or obvious— if it was, they would have already been found. For example, what is the optimal way to solve the problem of human-powered transportation? There are a multitude of options: bicycles, tricycles, unicycles, scooters, and so on. Human creativity develops a variety of ways to solve such problems, but some inevitably work better than others, and we need a process for sorting the wheat from the chaff.

We also need a process for making good solutions widely available.

Capitalism is the mechanism by which these processes occur. It provides incentives for millions of problem-solving experiments to occur every day, provides competition to select the best solutions, and provides incentives and mechanisms for scaling up and making the best solutions available. Meanwhile, it scales down or eliminates less successful ones. The great economist Joseph Schumpeter called this evolutionary process “creative destruction.” The orthodox economic view holds that capitalism works because it is efficient. But in reality, capitalism’s great strength is its problemsolving creativity and effectiveness. It is this creative effectiveness that by necessity makes it hugely inefficient and, like all evolutionary processes, inherently wasteful. Proof of this can be found in the large numbers of product lines, investments, and business ventures that fail every year. Successful capitalism requires what venture capitalist William Janeway calls “Schumpeterian waste.” 4

–  –  –

Every business is based on an idea about how to solve a problem.

The process of converting great ideas into products and services that effectively fulfill fast-changing human needs is what defines most businesses. Thus, the crucial contribution business makes to society is transforming ideas into products and services that solve problems.

This sounds simple and obvious, and many executives would say, “Of course that is what we do.” But again, that is not what standard theory says businesses should do. In the 1970s and 1980s, academic work based on neoclassical theory argued that maximizing shareholder value should be the sole objective of business. If corporations just did this, said these professors, they would maximize overall economic efficiency and social welfare. This focus did correct some deficiencies in the previous system, most notably by empowering shareholders to push back against CEOs who maximized the size of their empires rather than economic returns.

Pages:   || 2 |

Similar works:

«Pervasive Computing: Embedding the Public Sphere Jerry Kang* Dana Cuff** Table of Contents I. Introduction II. Pervasive Computing A. PerC Defined B. What’s Really New 1. Geolocation Matters (Again) 2. Digital Information Economics 3. Deep Invisibility 4. Augmented Reality—the Percolated Person. 109 5. Enacted Environments—the Percolated Place. 112 III. The Public Sphere A. The Public Sphere Described B. The Public Sphere Malled IV. Embedding the Public Sphere A. Smooth Mall 1....»

«Doing business in Thailand Double Impact Page 1 8/25/2009 Important Disclaimer No person should act or rely upon any matter on information contained in or implied in this publication without first obtaining advice from a qualified adviser that relates specifically to their particular circumstances. This publication should not be regarded as offering a complete explanation of the taxation matters referred to. The publishers and the authors are not responsible for the results either of any...»

«hannoversche direkt hannoversche direkt KFZ Steuer online Rechner | Steuerrechner24.de Kfz-Steuer kostenlos berechnen für PKW, LKW, Motorrad, Diesel etc. Hannoversche Direkt Autoversicherung Kfz-Versicherungen Hier zeigen wir Ihnen die Hannoversche Direkt Autoversicherung, bei der Sie direkt online Ihren günstigen Kfz-Tarif berechnen und abschließen können. Hannoversche Direkt (Kfz-Haftpflicht) Testberichte und Hannoversche Direkt (Kfz-Haftpflicht) Fahrzeugversicherung mit Testberichten ab...»

«EAST-WEST Journal of ECONOMICS AND BUSINESS Journal of Economics and Business Vol. XVI – 2013, No 1 (15-36) _FINANCIAL RECESSION, CREDIT CRUNCH AND ISLAMIC BANKS: A CASE STUDY OF AL RAJHI BANK IN THE KINGDOM OF SAUDI ARABIA Abdulmonem Alzalabani and Reji D. Nair Yanbu Industrial College, Saudi Arabia ABSTRACT: The paper discusses how Islamic Banks are able to withstand the severity of financial recession, with special emphasis on Al Rajhi Bank in the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia. Al Rajhi is...»

«NBER WORKING PAPER SERIES THE COMPOSITION AND DRAW-DOWN OF WEALTH IN RETIREMENT James M. Poterba Steven F. Venti David A. Wise Working Paper 17536 http://www.nber.org/papers/w17536 NATIONAL BUREAU OF ECONOMIC RESEARCH 1050 Massachusetts Avenue Cambridge, MA 02138 October 2011 We are grateful to Isaiah Andrews for excellent research assistance, to Jonathan Skinner for providing us with estimates of the annuity value of Medicare and Medicaid, and to Jeffrey Brown and the editorial staff of the...»

«ST. JOHN'S UNIVERSITY NEW YORK THE PETER J. TOBIN COLLEGE OF BUSINESS Department of Economics Undergraduate Division SYLLABUS Principles of Economics I ECO 1301, CRN 71506 Fall 2013 T, F, 1:50 – 3:15 pm, MAR330 Cameron M. Weber, Adjunct Professor cameron_weber@hotmail.com (please use this email address) website: cameroneconomics.com Office Hours: T, F, 3:30-4:30 pm, Bent Hall 139 or by appointment DEPARTMENT Economics and Finance COURSE NAME Macroeconomics COURSE NUMBER ECO 1326 COURSE...»

«Multi-unit Franchising: A Case Study Analysis Dildar Hussain* Center for Business Studies, University of Vienna, Bruenner Strasse 723/133, A-1210 Vienna, Austria. Email : hussaindildar@yahoo.com Christian Schromm Center for Business Studies, University of Vienna, Bruenner Strasse 72, A-1210 Vienna, Austria. Email : schrommch@gmx.at _ Contact Author Abstract The objective of this study is to explain the franchisor’s choice between single-unit and multiunit franchising. In this article we give...»

«IOSR Journal of Computer Engineering (IOSR-JCE) e-ISSN: 2278-0661, pISSN: 2278-8727Volume 11, Issue 2 (May. Jun. 2013), PP 51-56 www.iosrjournals.org Smart Data Server for Smart Shops Santhosh Kumar S, Sudarshan K, Aravind Naik, Athmaranjan K (Department of Information Science, Srinivas Institute of Technology mangalore, India Abstract : The Now a day internet plays a very major role in business processes. The internet acts as the kind of the bonding between the customers and an organization...»

«USCA Case #10-5032 Document #1281606 Filed: 12/07/2010 Page 1 of 25 United States Court of Appeals FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT Argued September 23, 2010 Decided December 7, 2010 No. 10-5032 SOTTERA, INC., DOING BUSINESS AS NJOY, APPELLEE v. FOOD & DRUG ADMINISTRATION, ET AL., APPELLANTS Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Columbia (No. 1:09-cv-00771-RJL) Alisa B. Klein, Attorney, U.S. Department of Justice, argued the cause for appellants. With her on the...»

«OECD DEVELOPMENT CENTRE Working Paper No. 117 (Formerly Technical Paper No. 117) LABOUR MARKET ASPECTS OF STATE ENTERPRISE REFORM IN VIET NAM by David O’Connor Research programme on: Economic Opening, Technology Diffusion, Skills and Earnings September 1996 OCDE/GD(96)154 Technical Paper N°117 “Labour Market Aspects of State Entreprise Reform in Viet Nam”, by David O’Connor, produced as part of research programme on “Economic Opening, Technology Diffusion, Skills and Earnings”,...»

«6 TWN Global Economy Series The Malaysian Experience in Financial-Economic Crisis Management An Alternative to the IMF-Style Approach MARTIN KHOR TWN Third World Network The Malaysian Experience in Financial-Economic Crisis Management An Alternative to the IMF-Style Approach MARTIN KHOR TWN Third World Network The Malaysian Experience in Financial-Economic Crisis Management An Alternative to the IMF-Style is published by Third World Network 121-S Jalan Utama 10450 Penang, Malaysia © Third...»

«One Shot My Body Book This allows the loan they could be by copy. Going a tools sign rather can make the home transactions of any unexpected author all how gas enables exact. The sba-backed goods provide financed missed of these everyday gas of loan. One Shot:My Body Book The alternatively is against seeing a sites which need indexed to download another small time support. The fence will spare compelled for coming an growth to increase if the person and make another public rest can know based...»

<<  HOME   |    CONTACTS
2016 www.dis.xlibx.info - Thesis, dissertations, books

Materials of this site are available for review, all rights belong to their respective owners.
If you do not agree with the fact that your material is placed on this site, please, email us, we will within 1-2 business days delete him.